Draft Simulator Coming Soon
2005-02-07 21:18
I should have the 2005 fantasy draft simulator ready in a couple of days.
In making this simulator, I consolidate a bunch of internet fantasy and statistical projections. I focus primarily on the starting lineups, since starters are mostly all we really care about for fantasy purposes.
To give you a bit of fun until then, here are some consolidated statistical projections for each team’s offensive starting lineup. I’ll just sort here by GPA, which should be a decent enough way to rank the teams. Pitchers not included. This is just a cheap toy. For serious toys, more assembly is required.
rank | team | ba | obp | slg | ops | gpa |
1. | red sox | .285 | .367 | .483 | .850 | .286 |
2. | cardinals | .284 | .362 | .486 | .848 | .284 |
3. | yankees | .278 | .368 | .470 | .838 | .283 |
4. | giants | .278 | .362 | .455 | .817 | .277 |
5. | phillies | .273 | .356 | .464 | .820 | .276 |
6. | athletics | .275 | .356 | .448 | .803 | .272 |
7. | rockies | .282 | .350 | .457 | .807 | .272 |
8. | orioles | .277 | .347 | .460 | .808 | .271 |
9. | cubs | .274 | .339 | .475 | .814 | .271 |
10. | mets | .272 | .349 | .456 | .804 | .271 |
11. | braves | .275 | .348 | .455 | .803 | .270 |
12. | reds | .267 | .347 | .455 | .802 | .270 |
13. | rangers | .273 | .336 | .472 | .808 | .269 |
14. | dodgers | .263 | .343 | .458 | .801 | .269 |
15. | padres | .278 | .354 | .438 | .792 | .269 |
16. | marlins | .278 | .345 | .446 | .790 | .267 |
17. | twins | .277 | .339 | .454 | .793 | .266 |
18. | indians | .272 | .341 | .450 | .791 | .266 |
19. | tigers | .278 | .339 | .453 | .792 | .266 |
20. | brewers | .266 | .343 | .446 | .788 | .266 |
21. | nationals | .269 | .340 | .443 | .784 | .264 |
22. | mariners | .277 | .339 | .445 | .784 | .264 |
23. | astros | .268 | .344 | .436 | .780 | .264 |
24. | white sox | .270 | .337 | .445 | .782 | .263 |
25. | angels | .280 | .338 | .444 | .782 | .263 |
26. | dbacks | .264 | .342 | .433 | .775 | .262 |
27. | blue jays | .272 | .340 | .430 | .770 | .261 |
28. | pirates | .269 | .334 | .436 | .769 | .259 |
29. | royals | .270 | .334 | .435 | .769 | .259 |
30. | devil rays | .268 | .327 | .423 | .750 | .253 |
Anything surprise you? I was surprised by:
- Positive side: Phillies and A’s. I probably shouldn’t have been surprised by the Phillies being fifth, but I was. The A’s won’t have a lot of power, but having Kendall and Ginter instead of Miller and Scutaro improves the OBP quite a bit.
- Negative side: White Sox and Angels. The Lee-for-Podsednik deal doesn’t look too good for the Chisox here. The Angels could defy these rankings; they are projected for the sixth-lowest OBP, but the fourth-highest batting average. Because of that, I’d guess they’ll actually end up closer to the middle in runs scored than the bottom.