Market Dynamics
by Ken Arneson
2006-02-10 19:59

Marine Layer has a fabulous essay over on his A’s ballpark blog about the relationship between the amount of personal income in a metropolitan area, and the number of sports teams in that market. Money quote:

Many outsiders and the Bay Area’s own media blame the market’s fickle, fair-weather fans for attendance woes. In the end, does this have more to do with simple market dynamics?

Read the whole thing.

Comments: 2
1.   joejoejoe
2006-02-10 22:14

1.  This reminds me of something I once heard about the Hartford Whalers (now Carolina Hurricanes) of the NHL. The Whalers were always mocked for having poor attendance but they had the highest percentage of season ticket holders per capita in a 50-mile radius of any team in the league. It's just that that circle had a small population and beyond was Bruin and Ranger territory. The fans that could reasonably identify with Hartford were the most passionate in the league.

That's a great study and it's clear that New York could stand a third (and fourth) baseball team. Both Manhattan and Brooklyn could support a team better in addition to the Mets (Queens/LI) and Yanks (Bronx, tri-state). If baseball didn't have an anti-trust exemption it's clear that teams would relocate in NYC.

2.   DXMachina
2006-02-12 05:22

2.  That's true about the Whalers (I was part of that small coterie of fans). The big problem was that the small attendance numbers caused them to raise ticket prices to ridiculous levels to make any money. My friend and I stopped going to games because the ticket prices just got to be too much for us to afford.

Comments on this post are closed.
This is Ken Arneson's blog about baseball, brains, art, science, technology, philosophy, poetry, politics and whatever else Ken Arneson feels like writing about
Original Sites
Recent Posts
Contact Ken
Mastodon

LinkedIn

Email: Replace the first of the two dots in this web site's domain name with an @.
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Ken Arneson
Archives
2021
01   

2020
10   09   08   07   06   05   
04   

2019
11   

2017
08   07   

2016
06   01   

2015
12   11   03   02   

2014
12   11   10   09   08   04   
03   01   

2013
12   10   08   07   06   05   
04   01   

2012
12   11   10   09   04   

2011
12   11   10   09   08   07   
04   02   01   

2010
10   09   06   01   

2009
12   02   01   

2008
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2007
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2006
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2005
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2004
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2003
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2002
12   10   09   08   07   05   
04   03   02   01   

1995
05   04   02