Macha Headscratchin’: Update
by Ken Arneson
2006-04-20 17:52

I’m not ready to jump on the Fire Macha bandwagon yet, because I think any manager would drive me nuts at times, but I do admit Ken Macha drives me nuts at times. Like in the A’s last two losses, where he made the exact same mistake–twice.

In both Sunday’s game and Wednesday’s game, Macha had the right guy up in the bullpen for a specific situation–and failed to bring the guy into the game. Which is just baffling to me–why get the guy ready for that moment, and then bring him in too late?

On Sunday, Huston Street was having a rough game, having pitched three games in a row. He had already given up the lead. Macha gets Joe Kennedy up in the pen. Hank Blalock comes up, but Kennedy probably isn’t ready yet, so he lets Street face Blalock. Ok, fine. But two batters later, Street still isn’t out of the inning, Kennedy is still throwing in the pen, and Brad Wilkerson comes up. So Kennedy has been warming up for several batters now, a lefty is up, Street is obviously struggling…and Macha leaves Street in there to face the lefty Wilkerson. Of course Wilkerson doubles, and the Rangers win.

Tuesday, the A’s were trailing 4-1, Joe Blanton was struggling, so Macha gets Kirk Saarloos ready. The Tigers have runners on second and third and one out. Macha orders an intentional walk to set up a double play. Saarloos is an extreme ground ball pitcher. What do you need most in this situation? A double play! So does Macha bring in the double-play pitcher he has up and ready for this situation? Of course not. Blanton gives up another hit, and the Tigers break the game open.

I don’t get it. In each case, Macha was thinking ahead to get the right guy ready for the situation, actually has him ready–and then doesn’t use him. How can you have the foresight to properly prepare for a situation, and then not use that prepared solution? Why get the pitcher ready if you’re not going to use him when the situation clearly calls for that pitcher? Baffling.

Update: And again, sorta. Huston Street was unavailable due to a pectoral muscle strain, so Justin Duchscherer was brought on to save the game, and failed miserably. Again there was a situation that called out for a ground ball pitcher, again Saarloos was ready, and again Macha didn’t use him.

But that’s it’s only “sorta” the same thing because, because this time, Saarloos wasn’t even really the right guy to have up in that situation. Joe Kennedy was. The only problem was, Kennedy was wasted in the top of the eighth.

Kennedy came in to get Granderson out for one batter, lefty-on-lefty in the top of the eighth. Which was a total waste, particularly considering Street was unavailable, because Barry Zito was still the pitcher of record, and had only thrown 100 pitches. You could throw Zito for one last lefty, not waste Kennedy, and then bring in Calero. Kennedy would then have been available in the ninth for Granderson, who ended up walking against Duchscherer, plating the winning run.

But for all of Macha’s mismanagement, I’m not nearly as annoyed at that as I am at Jason Kendall. I’ll have more about that in my next post.

Comments: 9
1.   JMK
2006-04-20 10:46

1.  Forgive me if this has been asked before, but what does the "Stop Casting Porosity" phrase mean on the top right of your page?

2.   Bob Timmermann
2006-04-20 11:12

2.  Now you're going to have to read Ken's long story about a mysterious billboard.

3.   Ken Arneson
2006-04-20 11:37

3.  1, answer here: /archives/156477.html

4.   Philip Michaels
2006-04-20 14:54

4.  As if to prove your point, Ken, Macha does it again on Thursday, leaving Justin Duchscherer in the game long after it's apparent to everyone in the ballpark that Duke just doesn't haven't going on today.

Well, apparent to almost everyone.

5.   Vishal
2006-04-20 15:28

5.  [4] duke probably shouldn't have gone in in the first place. calero only threw NINE pitches, and was doing just fine.

and then, in the bottom of the 9th, when the A's had bases loaded and 1 out and kendall at the plate, he lets kendall swing away on 3-1 and he grounds into a forceout at home. why not a squeeze?? kendall can probably bunt better than he can hit a flyball deep into the outfield. hell, when he swung away it didn't go that much farther than a bunt would've. what a lousy game.

6.   Ken Arneson
2006-04-20 15:59

6.  I am temporarily withholding judgment until I find out why Street wasn't in the game.

7.   Vishal
2006-04-20 16:07

7.  [6] i think it was a predetermined day off for street.

8.   Vishal
2006-04-20 16:10

8.  or it could be a strained pectoral muscle:
http://www.athleticsnation.com/comments/2006/4/20/18395/5680/59#59

9.   Vishal
2006-04-20 17:06

9.  yep, that's what it is: http://tinyurl.com/3hs6l

Comments on this post are closed.
This is Ken Arneson's blog about baseball, brains, art, science, technology, philosophy, poetry, politics and whatever else Ken Arneson feels like writing about
Original Sites
Recent Posts
Contact Ken
Twitter

LinkedIn

Email: Replace the first of the two dots in this web site's domain name with an @.
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Ken Arneson
Archives
2021
01   

2020
10   09   08   07   06   05   
04   

2019
11   

2017
08   07   

2016
06   01   

2015
12   11   03   02   

2014
12   11   10   09   08   04   
03   01   

2013
12   10   08   07   06   05   
04   01   

2012
12   11   10   09   04   

2011
12   11   10   09   08   07   
04   02   01   

2010
10   09   06   01   

2009
12   02   01   

2008
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2007
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2006
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2005
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2004
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2003
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2002
12   10   09   08   07   05   
04   03   02   01   

1995
05   04   02