My Last Milledge Column
by Ken Arneson
2006-07-26 10:37

The next A’s game I have tickets for is Saturday. As it turns out, this may turn out to be Barry Zito’s last game in an A’s uniform. I’ll have to remember to give him a standing ovation when he comes off the field, even if he gives up 10 runs in the first inning. Zito has provided a lot of viewing pleasure over the years, and I want to be sure to thank him.

This is relevant because rumors are flying around that Billy Beane is shopping Zito again. And of course, that means that the neverending Zito-for-Lastings Milledge rumors are back, too. I’m not going to write anything about it myself. I’ve already speculated about it, let’s see…1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 times already, and you know what they always say, eleven times is enough.

If you want more Zito/Milledge speculation, let me point you to MetsBlog, where Matthew Cerrone discusses the idea with ESPN’s Buster Olney. The words “Lastings” and “Milledge” shall not pass through my keyboard again until we are certain the trade will or will not happen. It’s all up to Omar Minaya.

Olney thinks that Beane would also be willing to go for Aaron Heilman instead, which I think is ridiculous. Heilman is only six months younger than Zito, and he’s accomplished almost nothing in comparison. Olney mentioned Heilman’s “upside”, but Heilman is running out of time for upside. His ERA is 4.47. In a weaker league. As a reliever. If Heilman is the return, I’d much rather keep Zito, try to win this year, and get two draft picks in what is supposed to be a very strong draft class.

The bigger question is a philosophical one: should the A’s trade Zito at all, when they’re still tied for first place with 62 games remaining? Is there any way they could get anything for Zito that wouldn’t decrease their chances of winning the division this year?

It’s an interesting question. The A’s upper farm system is so barren, that it’s hard to imagine the A’s getting much better than they are now in the next couple of years. This may be there best chance to win a division for a while. On the other hand, Zito is probably their best, or only, tool they have to restock the upper levels of the farm system with some talent.

Perhaps the Zito dilemma shouldn’t be viewed in a vacuum. There are ways Beane can improve the A’s in other areas to make up for the loss of Zito, and give the A’s a chance to compete this year and next. For example, I’d like to see the A’s go out and nab a third baseman like Joe Randa, just so they can let Eric Chavez hit the DL and fix his tendonitis with rest. Randa, mediocre as he is, would still easily improve on the .100 batting average that both Chavez and Antonio Perez are putting up there right now. Then maybe you have a healthy Chavez for September.

Comments: 6
1.   Philip Michaels
2006-07-26 16:39

1.  I also have tickets to Saturday's game.

I will cheer Barry Zito as well.

And I will be stunned if he's not in an A's uniform August 1.

But that's mostly because I believe Billy Beane disappeared on his way back from the World Cup, and the A's haven't announced it yet because they don't want to cause a panic.

2.   Ken Arneson
2006-07-26 17:00

2.  You may be right, Philip. The A's rumor mill has been awfully quiet until this Zito thing popped up. Perhaps Beane is missing!

3.   joejoejoe
2006-07-27 18:32

3.  Will the A's get any draft picks if Jay Payton refuses arbitration? Is he a B or C player?

4.   Ken Arneson
2006-07-27 22:11

4.  The formula for free agent compensation isn't calculated until the season is over, and I've never seen the actual formula they use written down anywhere.

Given the types of players who have been Type Bs in the past, I suppose it's possible Payton could be a Type B player, but we'll have to wait and see.

5.   joejoejoe
2006-07-28 00:02

5.  From MLB.com: "The former Club of a Player who became a free agent and ranks as a Type A, B or C Player shall be entitled to receive compensation in the form of a draft choice in the First-Year Player Draft succeeding the Player's election of free agency.

A Type A, B or C Player shall be a Player who became a free agent and ranks as a Type A, B or C Player under the statistical system of ranking Players set forth by the Elias Sports Bureau using statistics based on a two-year average for each respective position group.

Type A: Ranks in the upper 30% of his respective position group
Type B: in the upper 50%, but not in the upper 30%, of his respective position group
Type C: in the upper 60%, but not in the upper 50%, of his respective position group"

There are five different groupings of players (OF+1B+DH, 2B+3B+SS, C, SP, and RP) - Payton would have to be in the top 60% of his group as ranked by Elias to qualify for any compensation pick. He should be at least a C and maybe a B pick.

Has there been much talk about Zito going to the Yankees among A's fans? I think Robinson Cano for Zito would be move that helps both teams.

6.   Philip Michaels
2006-07-28 09:06

6.  6 I think any scenario that has Zito leaving Oakland would have at least one younger, Major League-ready arm arriving as part of the deal. So I really can't see any Zito-to-the-Yankees trade, since if the Yanks had any younger, Major League-ready arms, it would raise questions about why Sidney Ponson was in their employ.

Comments on this post are closed.
This is Ken Arneson's blog about baseball, brains, art, science, technology, philosophy, poetry, politics and whatever else Ken Arneson feels like writing about
Original Sites
Recent Posts
Contact Ken
Mastodon

LinkedIn

Email: Replace the first of the two dots in this web site's domain name with an @.
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Ken Arneson
Archives
2021
01   

2020
10   09   08   07   06   05   
04   

2019
11   

2017
08   07   

2016
06   01   

2015
12   11   03   02   

2014
12   11   10   09   08   04   
03   01   

2013
12   10   08   07   06   05   
04   01   

2012
12   11   10   09   04   

2011
12   11   10   09   08   07   
04   02   01   

2010
10   09   06   01   

2009
12   02   01   

2008
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2007
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2006
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2005
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2004
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2003
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2002
12   10   09   08   07   05   
04   03   02   01   

1995
05   04   02