Comparisons: Two Relievers
by Ken Arneson
2007-08-15 12:45

Check out the 2007 organizational stats for these two Oakland A’s relievers:

ERA WHIP BA OPS BABip S0/9 K/BB
2.76 0.98 .187 .519 .264 10.62 3.89
2.49 1.00 .193 .548 .269 10.74 3.89

Outstanding numbers, and eerily similar. Is it a trick question? Are they from the same guy? Nope…

The first reliever is Huston Street. The second one is Andrew Brown, the player the A’s got in the Milton Bradley trade.

As lines on a spreadsheet, Street and Brown look identical. As physical specimens, they look about as much like twins as Danny DeVito and Arnold Schwarzenegger. Street is listed as 6’0", 185 and throws with a near-sidearm delivery, while Brown brings his 6’6", 230 frame over the top, with a funky delivery that reminds me a lot of Kevin Appier:

When the A’s acquired Brown, I thought the A’s were just dumping Bradley for, shall we say, reasons of personality. It made little sense to me at the time otherwise, as the reports I’d heard about Brown made him sound like just another dime-a-dozen reliever the A’s could have picked up anywhere.

But obviously, Brown is much more than just staff filler. Now we can ask this question: would you rather have four months of Milton Bradley or four years of a second Huston Street? Granted, Brown accumulated more of the above stats at AAA than Street, and Brown is also 2 1/2 years older than Street, who just turned 24 this month. But Brown’s major league numbers so far are not any less excellent than his AAA numbers. Billy Beane’s deal is looking pretty darn good right now.

Comments: 5
1.   Icaros
2007-08-15 13:04

1.  I still think it's bizarre that Brown was one of the players the Dodgers traded to Cleveland to acquire Milton Bradley.

2.   Ken Arneson
2007-08-15 13:53

2.  Well, if Andrew Brown is worth Milton Bradley once, he's worth Milton Bradley twice, doggone it!

3.   gswitter
2007-08-15 16:19

3.  Yeah, but why was Depo involved with trading him away twice? The first time, fine - you gotta give action to get action. But the second time, Bradley was DFA'd. The Padres shouldn't have had to give up much, so they couldn't have thought much of Brown. Or maybe they just didn't forsee having a roster spot for him?

My memory's hazy... was Bradley DFA'd by Cleveland when things went sour for him there?

4.   jmoney
2007-08-15 17:39

4.  I don't know that Bradley was DFA'd, but I remember him being kicked off the team right at the end of Spring Training, and summarily being traded to the Dodgers.

I like what I've seen from Brown so far, but I don't trust him, for one reason: he reminds me of Jay Witasick. The first time I saw him pitch, I thought it was Witasick's ghost.

5.   olmedotimes
2007-08-15 22:47

5.  Doesn't look like he was DFA'd by Cleveland:

http://sports.espn.go.com/mlb/news/story?id=1773330

Comments on this post are closed.
This is Ken Arneson's blog about baseball, brains, art, science, technology, philosophy, poetry, politics and whatever else Ken Arneson feels like writing about
Original Sites
Recent Posts
Contact Ken
Mastodon

LinkedIn

Email: Replace the first of the two dots in this web site's domain name with an @.
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Ken Arneson
Archives
2021
01   

2020
10   09   08   07   06   05   
04   

2019
11   

2017
08   07   

2016
06   01   

2015
12   11   03   02   

2014
12   11   10   09   08   04   
03   01   

2013
12   10   08   07   06   05   
04   01   

2012
12   11   10   09   04   

2011
12   11   10   09   08   07   
04   02   01   

2010
10   09   06   01   

2009
12   02   01   

2008
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2007
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2006
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2005
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2004
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2003
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2002
12   10   09   08   07   05   
04   03   02   01   

1995
05   04   02