Furcal No Longer Athletics’ Top Priority
by Ken Arneson
2008-12-16 17:29

First, I confess I am writing this post mostly to tease Jon for his wishywashyness.

I suppose I need to say something about Rafael Furcal, then.  He was obviously Billy Beane’s Plan A for fixing the shortstop hole, but Plan A failed, even though Beane offered more money and years to Furcal than any other team.  I suppose it’s hard to sell a player on moving in to your city when you’re working really hard to move out.

Wolff/Beane:  Move to Oakland, it’s great!

Furcal:  If it’s so great, why are you trying to move to San Jose?

Wolff/Beane:  Umm…uhh…

The question now is, is there a Plan B that would bring the A’s back to competitiveness in 2009, or are we back to the old 2010-12 target date now?  Orlando Cabrera is the only other significant free agent shortstop left, but he will cost a 2nd-round draft pick, and he’s not nearly the upgrade over Crosby that Furcal would have been.  The Braves could presumably make Yunel Escobar available in a trade since they now have two shortstops, so we’ll look at him, and the perpetually trade-rumored Jack Wilson.

(I love that Fangraphs now has +/ numbers for offense and defense, so we can compare.  I’ll use the 2009 Marcels wRAA for offense and the career UZR/150 for defense.)

Player Offense Defense Total
Crosby -19.3 +3.7 -15.6
Wilson -7.6 +2.2 -5.4
Cabrera -9.9 +7.2 -2.7
Furcal +1.2 -3.4 -2.2
Escobar 7.8 +4.9 +12.7

Marcel dings Furcal because he missed large chunks of 2008 and played hurt in 2007. If he’s healthy, he probably performs more like a +10 to +15 player offensively.  So I’d group the talents like this:

Escobar
Furcal
— big gap–
Cabrera
–small gap–
Wilson
–big gap–
Crosby

With Furcal or Escobar, you’re looking about a three win improvement over Crosby.  Cabrera gets you about half that.  Does it take all three wins to improve the A’s enough to compete in 2009?  If so, should the A’s give up good prospects for Escobar?  If it only takes a win or two, should the A’s go after Cabrera or Wilson?  Sorry, I’ve got no answers.  I don’t have time to do that kind of math, that’s what I pay Billy Beane for.

Comments: 5
1.   trainwreck
2008-12-16 21:56

1.  Well, might as well use all that depth in the farm system to look for someone.

2.   Tripon
2008-12-16 22:50

2.  A's could always trade for the Dodgers' Hu if all you care about is defense.

3.   Johan
2008-12-17 00:46

3.  I think Cabrera is one of those guys I could hope to fail even as a player on my favorite team. A rare thing indeed.

Escobar would be sweet, so long as the Braves would take a couple above average prospects and not look for Cahill, etc.

4.   Jon Weisman
2008-12-17 06:46

4.  Wishy-washy-ness? That's my middle name. Or is it?

5.   Jason Wojciechowski
2008-12-17 17:45

5.  Well, suddenly Escobar looks a lot less available and Hu from the Dodgers looks more available. He's 25 already, and he's blocked for the next three years.

Using the same numbers as above, over a full season, he's about -14 on offense and +4 on defense, so he's like a half-win upgrade over Crosby. That said, he's got much less of a body of work to build those numbers from, so if the scouts say that he'll hit better than Crosby or field better than his major-league numbers indicate so far, maybe he's worth making a run for.

Then again, to the extent personalities and feelings matter, it's one thing to replace Bobby Crosby with an accomplished player like Rafael Furcal. It's a whole other thing to bring in Chin-Lung Hu and tell the team "that guy you spent the last five years with? He's gone. Here's a new guy who's maybe a smidge better."

Comments on this post are closed.
This is Ken Arneson's blog about baseball, brains, art, science, technology, philosophy, poetry, politics and whatever else Ken Arneson feels like writing about
Original Sites
Recent Posts
Contact Ken
Mastodon

LinkedIn

Email: Replace the first of the two dots in this web site's domain name with an @.
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Ken Arneson
Archives
2021
01   

2020
10   09   08   07   06   05   
04   

2019
11   

2017
08   07   

2016
06   01   

2015
12   11   03   02   

2014
12   11   10   09   08   04   
03   01   

2013
12   10   08   07   06   05   
04   01   

2012
12   11   10   09   04   

2011
12   11   10   09   08   07   
04   02   01   

2010
10   09   06   01   

2009
12   02   01   

2008
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2007
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2006
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2005
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2004
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2003
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2002
12   10   09   08   07   05   
04   03   02   01   

1995
05   04   02