Zito Thoughts, Part 1 of 3
by Ken Arneson
2006-12-29 7:29

I’m not a Giants hater like a lot of A’s fans. I’ll never leave my heart in AT&T Park, but if the Giants have an interesting team, I’ll watch and root for them. If not, I’ll ignore them.

The past several years, I’ve been doing a lot of ignoring. Watching a bunch of has-been and never-was old farts play .500 ball doesn’t turn me on. Nor does watching Barry Bonds take four pitches out of the strike zone over and over again.

In recent years, the Giants have had only two players I’ve enjoyed watching–Jason Schmidt and Omar Vizquel. Oh man, I could sit and watch Omar Vizquel play shortstop for hours on end. If we judged players solely by their artistry instead of their statisticry, Omar Vizquel would be the first guy voted in the Hall of Fame. He is lovely to watch.

So I’m actually pretty happy that Barry Zito signed with San Francisco. I love watching Zito pitch, and I’m happy that Giants games have immediately become a little more watchable every five days. Of course, Zito is replacing Schmidt, another player I like, so it’s only a minor improvement on the watchability scale. Ah, if only the Giants had extended Schmidt instead of signing Matt Morris…

* * *

Of course, the pundits all agree that the contract is too big, for too many years. But is it? Is there actually a plan here? There are a few points in the Giants defense:

  • How much is too much? We have absolutely no idea how much money the Giants have to spend.
  • If you’re going to give any pitcher in the world a seven-year contract in hopes he stays healthy all seven years, Barry “Never Missed A Start” Zito is probably the guy you’d want to give it to.
  • This gives the Giants a solid young pitching staff for years to come
  • .

This actually makes the Giants 2008 starting rotation look quite a bit like 2006 Oakland’s. You’ve got:

  • Zito
  • The star young flamethrower (Cain/Harden)
  • Another hard thrower (Lincecum/Haren)
  • A crafty young inning eater (Lowry/Blanton)
  • A crafty old inning eater (Morris/Loaiza)

Given that the Giants need to totally rebuild their team over the next few years, and have pretty much an empty farm system, what better way than to start by setting up a young, solid starting rotation? You can build a bullpen out of scrap, and probably find decent hitters under rocks, but good, young starting pitchers are really hard to find.

Now if Brian Sabean can take these old farts currently in his everyday lineup, and trade them in July for younger parts–lather, rinse, repeat–I’ll really be impressed.

* * *

I know the counterarguments. Zito is not an ace. He’s good, not great, and therefore shouldn’t get ace money. The money is better spent on better players than Zito.

I agree with that conclusion about Zito: he’s not an ace. He’s good, not great. However, I disagree with nearly every argument I’ve heard, including many from writers I respect, supporting that conclusion. I’ll get to that in my next (non-photo-outtake) blog entry. Part 2 here.

Comments: 6
1.   deadteddy8
2006-12-29 09:51

1.  Whoa whoa whoa...

Giants fan here to point out that Lincecum/Haren isn't at all a fair comparison. Tim the Enchanter shouldn't even start the season in The Bigs, while Haren is easily one of the top ten pitchers in his league and, after Santana and with Liriano on the mend, could compete with Holliday, Lackey, and Bonderman for second-best.

http://tinyurl.com/yb2caw

If Zito=Zito, then to match the A's of last year, Cain will have to =Haren, which I don't think will happen, despite Cain's awesomeness. Harden+assorted other starters might get matched by the Giants' 5th starters, but who knows with that bunch?

2.   Ken Arneson
2006-12-29 10:04

2.  1 Note I said 2008 rotation, not 2007.

3.   jakewoods
2006-12-29 10:53

3.  You can say the Giants have some great pitching under the age of 30.

4.   Robert Daeley
2006-12-29 11:26

4.  The best argument against it is the ~40% of the payroll the two Barrys likely take up next year.

5.   deadteddy8
2006-12-29 13:56

5.  2 My bad.

6.   MrIncognito
2007-01-01 18:59

6.  Given the premise that everything will turn out well, you can argue that half the teams in in baseball are going to have a great young nucleus in three years. Things have a way of not working out like that.

If there's anything the last decade of A's fandom should have taught us, it's that injuries and depth are hugely important. The Giants are likely to have a lot of the former and none of the latter: not a recipie for success.

Zito at $18 million per year makes sense only if you see him as an overpriced but useful last piece on your playoff team. The Giants are no where near that territory, and the contract makes no sense for the team.

Comments on this post are closed.
This is Ken Arneson's blog about baseball, brains, art, science, technology, philosophy, poetry, politics and whatever else Ken Arneson feels like writing about
Original Sites
Recent Posts
Contact Ken
Mastodon

LinkedIn

Email: Replace the first of the two dots in this web site's domain name with an @.
Google Search
Web
Toaster
Ken Arneson
Archives
2021
01   

2020
10   09   08   07   06   05   
04   

2019
11   

2017
08   07   

2016
06   01   

2015
12   11   03   02   

2014
12   11   10   09   08   04   
03   01   

2013
12   10   08   07   06   05   
04   01   

2012
12   11   10   09   04   

2011
12   11   10   09   08   07   
04   02   01   

2010
10   09   06   01   

2009
12   02   01   

2008
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2007
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2006
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2005
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2004
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2003
12   11   10   09   08   07   
06   05   04   03   02   01   

2002
12   10   09   08   07   05   
04   03   02   01   

1995
05   04   02